Antoinette Nwandu was at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago last June, about to fly home to New Jersey, when her phone started dinging with notifications. Her play “Pass Over” had just opened at Steppenwolf Theater Company, and Ms. Nwandu was exhausted from constant rewrites. She and the director, Danya Taymor, had agreed that they wouldn’t read reviews yet. First, they would take a week or so to bask in what they had achieved.
Ms. Nwandu’s phone kept going off, though, and by the time her plane landed, she couldn’t ignore what was happening: A controversy had erupted around her first major production. A contemporary Exodus story fitted to a “Waiting for Godot” frame, “Pass Over” — an LCT3 production that opens on Monday, June 18, at Lincoln Center Theater’s Claire Tow Theater — is set in a corner of an unnamed city where two African-American men live in fear of being shot dead by the police.
Inspired partly by the killing of Trayvon Martin, with main characters whose names, Moses and Kitch, Ms. Nwandu borrowed from a South Carolina slavery manifest, it is a Black Lives Matter play layered with the past.
But the catalyst for the clamor in Chicago, a city enduring a crisis of gun violence, wasn’t what Ms. Nwandu had written. It was a review of “Pass Over” in the Chicago Sun-Times, which, among other objections, took vehement exception to the way that Ms. Nwandu, who is black, depicted a white police officer. Many in the local theater scene swiftly condemned the review as racist. Steppenwolf, one of the nation’s premier regional theaters, accused the veteran critic who wrote it, Hedy Weiss, who is white, of “deep-seated bigotry and a painful lack of understanding of this country’s historic racism.”
A petition went up online, citing a pattern of “racism, homophobia, and body shaming” in Ms. Weiss’s writing and calling for theaters to stop inviting her to review their shows. Ms. Nwandu — who did some theater criticism herself before she realized that she wanted to make plays, not review them — signed it. In American Theater magazine, she wrote about the reaction to her play. But mostly, she said in an interview one afternoon this month, the hubbub felt “like being invited to dinner at somebody’s house, and during dinner that person and their family get into a fight about you, while you’re just sitting there.”
Calm, unpretentious and wry, she was sitting just then at a table in the decidedly utilitarian cafeteria of Borough of Manhattan Community College in TriBeCa, where she taught for seven and a half years, after earning an English degree from Harvard and a pair of master’s degrees — the first in cultural politics, from the University of Edinburgh; the second in dramatic writing, from New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts.
Ms. Nwandu, 38, grew up in Los Angeles in a deeply religious family; she was the first to go to college. As an undergraduate at Harvard, writing for the Crimson, she flirted with thoughts of a journalism career until she realized that the most tedious part of reporting was getting quotes when she already knew what she wanted people to say. Recalling that, she laughed — at herself, and also at how shocked her Crimson colleagues were that she’d voice such a thought. Making up dialogue: a journalist’s scandal, a playwright’s skill.
But a few months after she graduated from Tisch, in 2008, the economy tanked, and she was glad to take a job at the community college, where she taught introductory theater and public speaking. She felt torn, in that class, between the imperative to teach the kind of decorous speech that would be helpful in a job interview and the desire to hear the authentic voices of her young black and brown students, profanities and all. That’s the way Moses and Kitch talk.
She was on the verge of burnout two years ago when she abruptly quit. Told that she couldn’t take time off to attend rehearsals of “Pass Over” at the Cherry Lane Theater Mentor Project — the kind of artistic obligation that conservatory programs regularly accommodate — she chose theater over a steady paycheck.
![]()
“She took an amazing chance on herself,” Ms. Taymor said in a separate interview. “You see the power of that commitment in the returns.”
Such as: Last August, after the Steppenwolf production had closed, Ms. Nwandu was back in Chicago with another play, “Tuvalu,” when her agents called. The director Spike Lee — whose film “Chi-Raq” is a riff on Aristophanes’ “Lysistrata,” set amid gang warfare in contemporary Chicago — had read “Pass Over.” He wanted to talk.
“As my fiancé will tell you, I’m not great at getting good news,” Ms. Nwandu said. “I’m always like, ‘What’s the catch?’” So she was hesitant in her first telephone conversation with Mr. Lee. “I was like, ‘A: You didn’t see it in the theater. You’re just reading it. And, B: I might not be done with it.’”
Two hours later, she said, he called again to tell her that he was flying to Chicago so they could talk face to face. Over dinner, he said he wouldn’t ask for any of the rights to the stage production, that he didn’t care if she changed the play in the future but that he wanted to capture it in its current form on film in Chicago. She was convinced.
So at Steppenwolf in September, with the same cast plus one additional actor, in front of a mostly black invited audience, Mr. Lee secretly shot what is largely Ms. Taymor’s production, remounted for the film. He used 10 cameras, placing some behind or above the stage.
By January, they were at Sundance with the film, also titled “Pass Over,” when Mr. Lee asked Ms. Nwandu what she was doing in February — his way of dropping a job into her lap. She took it, becoming a staff writer on his Netflix series, “She’s Gotta Have It.” In March, she got engaged to her boyfriend, Graham Schmidt, a director. In April, “Pass Over” was released on Amazon Video. And this month, as a way of coaxing her younger sisters to New York for the opening of “Pass Over” at LCT3, she’s going shopping for a wedding dress.
A lot has happened in a year, and not just for Ms. Nwandu. In Chicago, where the Sun-Times defended its critic, Ms. Weiss, during the “Pass Over” controversy, it eliminated her job last winter. She is still reviewing, for the local PBS affiliate, and in an interview she said she wouldn’t have done anything differently in her “Pass Over” review.
Noting that she has covered African-American work in Chicago for almost all of the 34 years she has been a theater critic there, she called the accusation of racism against her “ludicrous,” and echoed an assertion she made in her review — that in focusing on police violence against black men, “Pass Over” unfairly ignores what she called “black-on-black” gun violence. “You have to face all of it at once and be honest about it,” Ms. Weiss said.
Altering the play’s focus was never on Ms. Nwandu’s agenda, though she has used the Lincoln Center run to revisit her text. The New York production has the same director and one of the same actors, Jon Michael Hill (of the CBS drama “Elementary”), but Ms. Nwandu and Ms. Taymor have made some significant changes since Chicago.
What’s held steady is whose point of view “Pass Over” represents: two young men, unarmed and dreaming desperately of a better life, afraid of being killed for being black.
The Newsroom Emmy winner Jeff Daniels will reunite with Aaron Sorkin as he headlines the writer’s stage adaptation of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird. The Bartlett Sher-helmed production, a collaboration between producer Scott Rudin and Lincoln Center Theater, will begin performances November 1 at a theatre to be announced. Opening night is set for December 13.
Daniels, who takes on the role of Atticus Finch, returns to Broadway after a Tony-nominated turn in 2016’s Blackbird. Joining him are fellow Tony nominee Celia Keenan-Bolger (The Glass Menagerie, Peter and the Starcatcher) as Scout, Will Pullen (Sweat) as Jem, and Gideon Glick (Significant Other, Spring Awakening) as Dill. The casting of the three—each notably older than their respective characters—indicates Sorkin’s previously reported intentions to present the drama as a memory play.
The company will also include Tony nominee Stephen McKinley Henderson (Fences), Tony nominee LaTanya Richardson Jackson (A Raisin in the Sun) as Culpurnia, Tony nominee Stark Sands(Kinky Boots) as Horace Gilmer, Dakin Matthews (Waitress, Rudin’s upcoming The Iceman Cometh) as Judge Taylor, Frederick Weller (Mothers and Sons, Glengarry Glen Ross) and Erin Wilhelmi (A Doll’s House, Part 2) as Bob and Mayella Ewell, and Gbenga Akinnagbe (The Wire) in his Broadway debut as Tom Robinson, as well as Phyllis Somerville and Liv Rooth.
Additional casting will be announced at a later date.
The production will feature sets by Miriam Buether, costumes by Ann Roth, lighting design by Jennifer Tipton, sound design by Scott Lehrer, and an original score by Adam Guettel. Casting is by Daniel Swee.
In 1947, the photographer Irving Penn made a black-and-white portrait of a young American musician. He is seated on drab carpeting draped over a chaise-like shape, vaguely old-world. The carpet’s mossy folds throw luxuriant shadows, and the musician upon them wears white tie and tails, a black overcoat caping his shoulders. He is relaxed, his left elbow propped on his left leg, which is hitched up on the seat, and his left cheekbone resting in his left hand as he gazes into the camera. His only visible ear, the right, is large—and as centrally positioned in the portrait as middle C. Is this a fin de siècle poet dressed for the theater? Is that a cigarette butt lying on the floor? Leonard Bernstein never looked more beautiful.
The following year, Penn took a black-and-white photograph of another young American artist, only here the subject is wedged between two walls forming a tight V—a Penn visual trademark. This man, barefoot and wiry, wears a turtleneck and black tights cropped at the calf. His feet press against the walls, a stride that suggests the Colossus of Rhodes. Yet his torso twists in another direction, and his arms are held tightly behind his back, hidden as if handcuffed. His expression is wary. Does the Colossus mistrust the camera or himself? Leave it to Jerome Robbins to choreograph a dance of inner conflict that lasts the length of a shutter’s click.
At this time, most of Penn’s subjects were middle-aged and long-established, but not these two. “Lenny” and “Jerry” were newly minted princes of the city—New York City, the postwar capital of the arts. Both were artists in love with classicism, trained in European traditions yet bending them to their new-world will. And both, in defiance of immigrant fathers who scorned the arts as a losing proposition, had their first big successes at the age of 25.
Each man in his own right was astonishing. Until his death, in 1990, Leonard Bernstein would be the most important musician in America, period. His fourfold eminence as a conductor of the world’s greatest orchestras, a composer of music in myriad forms, a concert pianist, and a teacher on television and at Tanglewood added up to a matchless legacy of accessibility and eloquence, gravity and theatricality, intellectual precision and ecstatic transport. He was a telegenic musical mensch—magisterial. Jerome Robbins, who died in 1998, was less public, a watcher whose uncompromising vision as a choreographer and director—in ballet and on Broadway, in shows filmed and on television—placed the power of dance before America’s baby-boomers and their parents. A storyteller in movement, Robbins daily murdered his darlings and those of his colleagues—dance phrases that were too fancy or distracting, music, text, and emotion that were too much. Truth, moment to moment, was all that mattered. He wasn’t a mensch. He was a perfectionist whose gypsy instinct for the essential, his eye as sharp as a shiv, demanded the best in others or just go home. Few chose to go home. And certainly never Lenny.
Both these men were about energy—positive, negative, generative—and while they racked up stunning achievements separately, they were elevated when joined. Put them together in collaboration—in masterpieces such as the joyous ballet Fancy Free, the breakaway musical On the Town, and the electrifying experiment West Side Story—and you had an ongoing theatrical Manhattan Project, work kinetically detonated, irreducibly true, and oh so American.
They were born within two months of each other, one hundred years ago, in 1918—Louis Bernstein, called “Leonard” by his parents, on August 25 in Lawrence, Massachusetts, and Jerome Wilson Rabinowitz on October 11 in New York City. When they first met, 25 years later, it was the kismet of kindred spirits, their upbringings variations on a theme: middle-class, Russian-Jewish, tough love from difficult fathers who were busy achieving the American Dream. Sam Bernstein did well in his own beauty-supply business, having grabbed the New England franchise for the Frederics permanent-wave machine, a device used in beauty salons, and Harry Rabinowitz, after moving the family to Weehawken, New Jersey, ran the Comfort Corset Company. While both men loved music, including the songs of the synagogue, and took pride in the accomplishments of their children (Lenny had younger siblings Shirley and Burton; Jerry an older sister, Sonia), they expected their sons to come into the family business and were horrified by the artistic ambitions blossoming in their homes. When a piano belonging to Aunt Clara was parked in the Bernstein hallway, Lenny, aged 10, found his reason to be. “I remember touching it,” he said, “and that was it. That was my contract with life, with God. . . . I suddenly felt at the center of a universe I could control.” For Jerry, who’d been playing violin and piano from the age of three and who began taking dance classes in high school, “art seemed like a tunnel to me. At the end of that tunnel I could see light where the world opened up, waiting for me.”
Note the shared language of rapture. “Jerry just breathed theater,” says the composer and lyricist Stephen Sondheim, who worked with both men. “Lenny had a really wonderful sense of theater, but he breathed music.”
Still, there were crucial differences. Lenny’s mother, Jennie, doted and adored, while Jerry’s mother, Lena, was impossible to please (a favorite gambit: if Jerry misbehaved, she would pretend to call the orphanage with a donation--him). Lenny was educated at Harvard and then on scholarship at the Curtis Institute of Music. Jerry, who had to leave New York University after one year because it was too expensive, was permanently insecure about his lack of education. And when it came to being Jewish, Lenny was proud of his heritage. He cherished memories, dating back to his boyhood, of the times he and his father sang together at temple. When Serge Koussevitzky, one of the several conductors who mentored Lenny, and himself a Jew, suggested he Anglicize his name to Leonard S. Burns, he replied, “I’ll do it as Bernstein or not at all.” (Pronounced Bern-stine, with a long i.)
For Jerry, being Jewish brought shame and fear. Asked to say his name on the first day of first grade, he began to cry. “Rabinowitz” was so not American. “I never wanted to be a Jew,” he would write in notes for an autobiography. “I wanted to be safe, protected, assimilated.” Once he began performing, his name changed program to program, from Robin Gerald to Gerald Robins to Jerry Robyns to Gerald Robin to Jerome Robbins. It is often said that Leonard Bernstein wanted everyone in the world to love him; while still in college he said as much to a close friend. Lenny lived with arms open. Jerry did not feel lovable and was deeply guarded. At the height of his mastery on Broadway he insisted that his billing include a box around his name, showcasing his contribution, protecting it, arms crossed around it.
They met in October of 1943, the beginning of what Bernstein would call “the year of miracles.” Bernstein was living in New York City, marking time as the assistant conductor of the New York Philharmonic, and Robbins was in the classical company Ballet Theatre. Both were hungry for the Big Break, but it was hard to see anything on the horizon. Bernstein’s would come a month later, when on November 14 he took the podium at Carnegie Hall—without rehearsal!—and conducted for the ailing Bruno Walter. This kiss of fate allowed him, in one afternoon, to loosen forever Europe’s grip on the conductor’s baton. His debut made the front page of The New York Times, and the skinny kid, soon dubbed the Sinatra of the concert hall, soared to stardom. Two months later his Symphony No. 1, Jeremiah, was premiered.
Robbins had to make his own luck. Though a dazzling mimic and scene-stealer in character roles, he was tired of dancing courtiers and exotics in the corps. He wanted to choreograph ballets that were immediately American. After inundating company management with over-ambitious ideas for ballets, Robbins finally offered up a timely, simple scenario—three wartime sailors on shore leave in Manhattan. Management bit. All he needed was a score, which took him to Bernstein’s studio in Carnegie Hall.
On that October day in ‘43, Robbins described his ballet—not yet titled Fancy Free—and in answer Lenny hummed the tune he’d written on a napkin that afternoon at the Russian Tea Room. Jerry flipped. The sound was spontaneous and streetwise. “We went crazy,” Lenny recalled. “I began developing the theme right there in his presence.”
“The one thing about Lenny’s music which was so tremendously important,” Robbins said later, “was that there always was a kinetic motor—there was a power in the rhythms of his work, or the change of rhythms in his work and the orchestration—which had a need for it to be demonstrated by dance.”
‘I remember all my collaborations with Jerry in terms of one tactile bodily feeling,” Bernstein said in 1985, “which is his hands on my shoulders, composing with his hands on my shoulders. This may be metaphorical but it’s the way I remember it. I can feel him standing behind me saying, yes, now just about four more beats there . . . yes, that’s it.”
This was the kind of hands-on collaboration that Bernstein—who never liked being alone in a room—would always love. And it wasn’t metaphorical. Carol Lawrence, the original Maria in West Side Story, has said that “Lenny would bring in new music and he would play it for us. And Jerry would be standing over him and he’d clutch Lenny’s shoulders as if he were a musical instrument. He was always capable of coming up with a new melody, whatever Jerry needed.”
Key words: “standing over him.” In their relationship, Jerry was the leader, dominant, the overlord—everyone says this—and Lenny was flexible, with quick response time and an inexhaustible archive of musical forms from which to pull. Bernstein was steeped in the classical repertory, and he was a savant when it came to rhythm. “We were always embarrassed by his dancing,” says his older daughter, Jamie Bernstein. “But when it was put into the context of conducting or composing, suddenly his sense of rhythm was spectacular—it’s what gives his music a thumbprint. There’s no explaining why he had this incredible aptitude for rhythm, but it is true that he synthesized what he got out of Hebrew cantillation, and the music and dancing in that world, combined with his getting really obsessed with what were called race records, in his college years—Billie Holiday and Lead Belly—to say nothing of Stravinsky and Gershwin. Add the Latin-American thread, which came in around 1941, when he was in Key West, and he just went bananas.”
Because Robbins was touring with Ballet Theatre, much of the collaboration on Fancy Free’s score took place through the mail. Exuberance shoots through Lenny’s updates, letters of magical rapport and full of cocky confidence, just like the sailors in the ballet. A letter of late 1943: “I have written a musical double-take when the sailor sees Girl #2—has that ever been done before? And the rhythm of your pas de deux is something startling—hard at first, but oh so danceable with the pelvis!” Some friends who knew them then have said that Bernstein and Robbins had a brief affair. Others say not. But this was one more thing that Lenny and Jerry had in common—bisexuality. At the very least, the letters are full of excitement.
And the excitement was realized. Fancy Free was one of the greatest hits in ballet history—22 curtain calls on opening night, April 18, 1944. With a set by Oliver Smith, evoking the city at dusk, the ballet was a perfect little playlet, a New Yorker short story out of Jerome Robbins, so clearly articulated in movement slang and classical momentum that words would have been overkill. Lenny conducted, and his buoyant presence, that too was choreographic. “His downbeat, delivered against an upward thrust in the torso, has an instantaneous rebound, like that of a tennis ball,” wrote the distinguished dance critic Edwin Denby. “And you could see that the dancers, even when they came on tired, responded to Mr. Bernstein like hepcats to Harry James.” Bernstein’s physical brio on the podium would become a signature—the “Lenny dance,” he called it.
Steam Workshop is a feature of Steam that simplifies mods discovery and installation for players. Support for Crusader Kings II was added in March 2014, with patch 2.1.As of patch 2.8 the limit of 50MB has been lifted, allowing for large overhaul or total conversion mods to be on the workshop. Culture conversion events – Events concerning the conversion of yourself or others to a different culture. Dynasty – Events concerning a character's dynasty; Evil – These are events that are 'evil', since they mostly cause ill effects in provinces. Family – These are events that to. Crusader Kings II. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. Modify the World. Modify your Crusader Kings II experience by checking out the many mods created and shared by the community, including tweaks to almost any aspect of the game. Stand ready, and increase your prestige until the world whispers your name in awe. Do you have what it takes to become a Crusader King? Crusader Kings II explores one of the defining periods in world history in an experience crafted by the masters of Grand Strategy. Feb 14, 2012 “In short, Crusader Kings II is a majestic feudal sandbox, the greatest generator of hilarious medieval soap opera ever created and Paradox Interactive’s best title to date.” 90/100 – IncGamers “It's perfectly possible to have made a few too many enemies, anger the Pope and find most of Europe out for your blood. Crusader kings 2 reddit.
“We’re 70 years on in the life of that ballet and it is so alive,” says Damian Woetzel, the incoming president of the Juilliard School and a former principal dancer at the New York City Ballet, where he danced Robbins’s own role in Fancy Free. “These were true American voices that were addressing what it meant to be American, through dance and music. And finding their foothold at a moment when America, during the war and afterwards, is becoming more and more indispensable—as a country and as a force. I see Fancy Free as their mighty yawp. There they are--wham—they’ve arrived.”
“A collaboration as frequent and close as theirs is a marriage,” saysStephen Sondheim.
Shortly after Fancy Free’s premiere, Robbins was already pushing the envelope, thinking about a “ballet dance play in one scene, combining the forms of dance, music, & spoken word into one theater form.” It didn’t come to anything at Ballet Theatre, but when Oliver Smith suggested that the situation of Fancy Free might be retooled into a Broadway show, spontaneity and content merged and the result was On the Town. That a whole show could bounce out of a short ballet attests not only to the emotional richness of Fancy Free but to the ready invention of Robbins and Bernstein, now joined by the madcap writing team Betty Comden and Adolph Green. As Adam Green, Adolph’s son, wrote in these pages, the four agreed that “all the elements of the show would work as an integrated unit, with story, songs, and dancing all growing out of one another.”
It was musical theater cracked open, the plot morphologically cascading, evolving itself scene to scene. Bernstein revealed a gift for lyric simplicity, and his shake-a-leg symphonism, which shot between highbrow dissonance and brash Big Band, had the glitter of mica in Big Apple sidewalks. “The harmonies, the way that Bernstein wrote the city,” says Paul Gemignani, musical director of Jerome Robbins’ Broadway, in 1989, “it sounded like New York in 1944, as opposed to New York in Gershwin’s time.” Bernstein was blown away by Robbins’s acute theatrical instincts—”incredible, musically.” Yes, Jerry’s instincts were already impressive.
A mere eight months later, on December 28, 1944, On the Town opened on Broadway, directed by that granddaddy of the stage George Abbott. It was a show, the critic Louis Biancolli wrote, “planned, worked out, and delivered in a ballet key.”
“It was audacious,” says the director Harold Prince, who while still in college saw the musical nine times. “I thought, I’ve never seen classical music, classical ballet, and a lighthearted zany show all put together and make sense. I loved it so much, and at the same time, more subconsciously, I was trying to see how those disparate elements came together to make such an incredibly successful evening.”
‘When I talk of opera,” George Abbott wrote to Bernstein a year later, in 1945, “I am talking about a new form which does not now exist: I am talking about something which I expect you to create . . . unhampered by tradition.” Paging West Side Story. The subject for this “new form,” however, came not to Bernstein but to Robbins, in 1947. Helping his lover, the actor Montgomery Clift, figure out how the role of Romeo might be refashioned in the present tense, Robbins thought, Why not create a contemporary Romeo and Juliet? In 1949, a first try by Robbins, Bernstein, and the writer Arthur Laurents, which substituted Catholics and Jews for Capulets and Montagues, went nowhere. But in 1955, with gang violence making headlines, Laurents suggested a shift to rival street gangs. Robbins insisted that the show be cast with young unknowns who could dance as well as sing—because dance is a tribal language, primal and powerful. The fusion of forms would be as snug as a switchblade, and the musical would move as the crow flies, direct and dark. The New York premiere was September 26, 1957: Jets and Sharks; Polish-Irish-Italian Americans vs. Puerto Ricans; Tony and Maria. Robbins was the engine and Bernstein the environment, his score sui generis—a rite of spring inside a Ben Shahn line drawing.
Photos: Leonard Bernstein, Jerome Robbins, and Their Legendary Collaboration
1 / 10
Left, © The Irving Penn Foundation; Right, From Vogue, July 1948/© Condé Nast .
PENN PALS
Irving Penn’s portraits of Jerome Robbins, New York, 1948 (left), and Leonard Bernstein, New York, 1947.
The genesis, impact, and influence of West Side Story has been explained and analyzed in countless histories and memoirs. Its team—Robbins, Bernstein, book by Arthur Laurents, lyrics by the fledgling Stephen Sondheim—is perhaps the most brilliant in Broadway history. Hard to believe now that the suits at Columbia Records, when Bernstein and Sondheim auditioned the score for them, thought it was too advanced, too wordy, too rangy--and no one can sing “Maria.” This masterpiece continues to defy category, though Laurents came closest when he called it “lyric theater.” As Martin Charnin, an original Jet who went on to direct and write his own shows, says today, “You know how there’s Mount Everest and then there are mountains? As far as I’m concerned, there’s West Side Story and then there are musicals.” This was the pinnacle of the Bernstein-Robbins enterprise.
‘I will never, never work with Jerome Robbins again, as long as I live”—long pause of silence—“for a while.” Gerald Freedman, Robbins’s assistant director on West Side Story, remembers Bernstein saying this over dinner, after the show opened. By 1957, the differences between Bernstein and Robbins, which Irving Penn captured so well in those portraits of ‘47 and ‘48, were far more pronounced. Bernstein had married the sublime Felicia Montealegre Cohn, a Costa Rican–born actress and musician, in 1951; he was now the father of Jamie and Alexander (Nina yet to come); and he had just signed on as music director of the New York Philharmonic. It was a celebrated, expansive, and overstuffed life, extremely social, his time for composing dovetailed in with difficulty. Robbins, meanwhile, was indeed a colossus with a Broadway hit parade to his name, shows including High Button Shoes, The King and I, Pajama Game, Peter Pan, and Bells Are Ringing. (Gypsy was just around the corner.) But he was still uncomfortable in his own skin, hot-tempered with his collaborators, and a slave driver at work, demanding every minute, every second, of time owed him. It didn’t help that in 1953, threatened by the House Un-American Activities Committee with a public outing of his homosexual relationships, Robbins named names. Felicia Bernstein didn’t speak to him after that, or not much, and wouldn’t have him in the apartment. When he went over to work with Lenny he headed directly to the studio. In fact, there were only two people that Lenny deferred to: Felicia and Jerry. Both could make him sweat. Regarding Jerry, Bernstein’s view was simple: We have to cater to genius.
“A genius for me means endlessly inventive,” says Sondheim. “With the accent on the ‘endlessly.’ Jerry had this endless fount of ideas. And, man, you couldn’t wait to go home and write after you got finished talking to Jerry. Nobody matches Jerry in musical theater. Nobody had Jerry’s invention. Nobody.”
“When their strengths came into alignment it was like the starsaligning,” says John Guare.
The problem was that “Jerry worked best when it was all instinct,” says the playwright John Guare. “And the one thing that Jerry did not trust was his instinct.” His infernal second-guessing—an aesthetic integrity that had him tossing out thrilling ideas in search of even better, truer ones—could get maddening, irrational. “Dostoyevsky territory,” Guare calls it. And despite his wit and charm after hours, Robbins at work used confrontation and cruelty to get his way. “Black Jerome” was Bernstein’s nickname. During the dress rehearsal of West Side Story, right under Lenny’s nose, Black Jerome simplified the orchestrations of “Somewhere” without batting an eye.
“Our father was fearless,” says Alexander Bernstein. “But when Jerry was coming over and there was a big meeting, he was scared.” In the company of geniuses, Jerry was primus inter pares, first among equals.
“No matter what the material was,” says Guare, “if Jerry wanted to do it, people would follow him.” And if the material wasn’t right? In 1963, Robbins asked Bernstein to help him make a musical of Thornton Wilder’s apocalyptic The Skin of Our Teeth. They started, but, as often happened, other obligations got in the way—for Lenny, the Philharmonic; for Jerry, Fiddler on the Roof. In 1964 they returned to the Wilder with high hopes; Comden and Green were now on board and New York was waiting. Six months later the project was abandoned, no explanations. Privately, Bernstein called it a “dreadful experience.” The Robbins biographer Amanda Vaill suggests that Robbins may have become just too authoritarian for his On the Town family. Bluetip dischord no. 101 rar music. Robbins himself wrote, “We did not want to think of a world after a nuclear war.” Adam Green’s understanding from his father was that “Jerry got restless and walked away, and then Lenny did, too.”
Worse was Robbins’s attempt in 1968, revisited in 1986, to turn Brecht’s play The Exception and the Rule into a sort of musical vaudeville, a torturous episode for everyone involved, especially Bernstein. “The material refused to be transformed,” says Guare, who was brought in to write the book. “It was like dealing with a dead whale in the room. Lenny kept saying to Jerry, ‘Why do you need me in this show?’ He was afraid he was just being used to supply incidental music and he wanted to make a statement that would give it importance. Jerry would not give him that opening.” Again, Jerry walked out of the project—in the middle of casting, no less—and Lenny burst into tears.
“Yup,” says Paul Gemignani. “It’s not going to work. There’s no boss in the room.”
Bernstein’s “never, never—for a while” always passed. His letters are filled with his and Jerry’s ideas for collaboration, and Jerry’s journals reflect continuing awe at Lenny: “He hits the piano & an orchestra comes out.”
“A collaboration as frequent and close as theirs is a marriage,” says Sondheim. “As a collaborator I’ve had a lot of marriages. That’s exactly what’s involved.” Bernstein and Robbins admired and antagonized each other, exhilarated and wounded each other, loved and at times hated each other. They were both, Jerry wrote in his journal, oversensitive and insensitive: “he scared of me & me feeling he always put me down.” Yet neither one ever thought to let this artistic marriage go. At their best, they completed each other.
“The need for Lenny to work with Jerry,” says Charnin, “was just another side of the coin that was the need Jerry had to work with Lenny.”
“They would both do other things,” says Jamie Bernstein, “but then they would try again together to achieve this higher thing that they were both so obsessed with. They loved to break down the walls between genres, making things more fluid.”
“Obviously, if you break boundaries,” says Harold Prince, the producer of West Side Story, “you want to break further and larger boundaries. Jerry wanted to dig deeper and deeper. And Lenny could deliver. He had a sense of size—no borders, no boundaries.”
“They were two extraordinary balls of energy,” says Guare, “two spinning dynamos occupying the same space. And they each needed success. They had in common a hatred of failure. When their strengths came into alignment it was like the stars aligning. But there was no control over that.”
Their last collaboration to see the stage was a work they had wanted to do since Fancy Free’s premiere. In 1944, flush with the future, they were both drawn backward to a Yiddish classic of 1920—S. Ansky’s play of love, death, and possession, The Dybbuk, or Between Two Worlds. The work was tailor-made for them. It spoke to their shared lineage as Russian Jews. It told the story of soulmates Chanon and Leah, and the mystical link between them. (“When you make your first work with someone,” Robbins would say in an interview before Dybbuk’s premiere, “it makes for a certain bond.”) And the play’s focus on the existential secrets of the Kabbalah had a Promethean subtext, the reaching after cosmic—read artistic—power. But it didn’t happen then. Success carried them away from Ansky and straight to On the Town. Two more Robbins-Bernstein ballets came in 1946 and 1950--Facsimile and Age of Anxiety, both psycho-analytically probing—but they are now lost.
“Dybbuk Dybbuk Dybbuk,” Robbins wrote to Bernstein in 1958. “With this ghost’s effort I know that suddenly something will be on paper that will get us all started.” They finally made a start in 1972, and, when N.Y.C.B. Kumbali trance mp4 download. scheduled Dybbuk’s premiere for May 1974, expectations ran high. “It was a big, big deal, Lenny and Jerry working together again,” remembers Jean-Pierre Frohlich, who oversees the Robbins repertory at N.Y.C.B.
Robbins had come to a place of peace about being a Jew. A trip to Masada, in Israel, had moved him profoundly. According to Dan Duell, the artistic director of Ballet Chicago, Robbins “wanted to capture the rarefied atmosphere that was still alive and breathing there. Dybbuk was an attempt to evoke the magical spirit of their heritage.” Robbins planned to dramatize the story, to play to his greatest strength. Bernstein wrote a magnificent score—brooding, gliding, gleamingly nocturnal. But then Robbins backed away from narrative and into abstraction. “It was a very precious subject to Jerry,” says former N.Y.C.B. dancer Bart Cook, “one that he really wanted to do—but was afraid of. You should have seen some of the scenery, gold-covered flames, and the Kabbalah stuff and the symbolism. He just axed it all. It was too exposing.” When Bernstein told People magazine, “The ballet is based on our experience in Jewishness,” Robbins corrected him: “It isn’t.”
“I want to seize a clear and brilliant diamond,” says Chanon in Ansky’s play, “to dissolve it in tears and draw it into my soul!” Robbins was no doubt referring to this line when he said, some years later, that he’d wanted to make “a very hard diamond of a ballet.” Perhaps he couldn’t see it at the time, but that’s exactly what he and Bernstein made—a black diamond, glinting with astral refractions. Patricia McBride, the first Leah, loved dancing Dybbuk. “I felt totally immersed in it and lost,” she says, “lost in the music.” Dybbuk comes back into N.Y.C.B. repertory this spring, a tale of two souls fated and luminously fused. Until the end of their lives, Lenny and Jerry’s respect for each other, their mutual support, never wavered.
Talkin Broadway All That Chat Play
Perry Silvey, the longtime technical director of the New York City Ballet, remembers running a rehearsal sometime in the late 80s. It was a quiet ballet, and there was noise above the stage, coming from the galleries where the fly-floor guys and bridge-spot operators work. “As we were rehearsing we keep hearing guys talking,” says Silvey. “I’m out in the house and even the dancers are kind of annoyed. Over the headset I said, ‘Please, guys, keep it down. There’s too much talking going on.’ And this happens a couple of times. Finally I walk all the way up onstage and yell, ‘Quiet on the gallery!’ I look up and there’s Jerry and Lenny, side by side, looking over the rail at me. They were probably up in Jerry’s office—there’s a door from the fourth-floor hallway that goes right into that gallery—and they just sneaked in to look down and see what was happening onstage. They were having a real good time, obviously. And when the two of them, old pros, realize they’ve been in the wrong, the most hilarious thing—they both cover their mouths with their hands and almost giggle, and then slink away like two schoolboys.”
Or like two boy wonders—co-pilots on the same comet.
[Intro: Ca$his]
Uh, yeah Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah We're renegades (Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah) We're renegades (Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah) Hit me up, man! [Verse 1: Ca$his] Bitch I'm from the {nine}, yo' hood ain't no realer You the pussy ass nigga livin next to the killer I'm the killer that moved out of the block And head back to the hood, when I'm movin my rock You can find me, on a dark road, dark clothes Lle', in the console and God knows I make grip off blow Shit - I could get rich off blows My nation affiation pitch forks I've chose What the fuck you gon' do? We bang back hammers I'm a six point star, in a gray bandanna I'd die for this, nigga you rhyme for this Pussy I ride for this, and did time for this That's why I'm convinced you fear, that I'm convicted Until elevens in soaps, and some gangsta shit man Guess who gorillas leave tats infragments Two shots through your cabbage, and gas from Ca$h [Hook: Ca$his] Pussy niggas always talkin that shit What you flaggin, who you bangin with? (I don't give a fuck) You can live in the hood and shit But remember who you bangin with (I don't give a fuck) Pussy niggas talkin all that shit What you flaggin in your bangin whip? (I don't give a fuck) You can live in the hood and shit But remember who you bangin with (cause I don't give a fuck) [Verse 2: Ca$his] Tip our levels and scarce piece, a meal beast We'll creep one deep, slump seat, dump heat Niggas scream 'Fuck me' he lucky, when I blast it I left respect enough for an open casket Way to go Ca$his, boost up my ego Let loose, out sunroof with my Eagle Folk of the century, rollin with peoples The omen the sequel, the more they will see you Close kin, molotov close to no skin His momma pretends that she doesn't, know him I'm the reason, for the whole 'Say No' slogan Doped in folk and loc'ed if provokin Got a brand new thing, with the scope in Leave your family, with the wake for hostin I'll collect enough snow, 'til my hands the Aspens I'm the realest nigga 'round here, ask for Ca$his folk [Hook: Ca$his] Pussy niggas always talkin that shit What you flaggin, who you bangin with? (I don't give a fuck) You can live in the hood and shit But remember who you bangin with (I don't give a fuck) Pussy niggas talkin all that shit What you flaggin in your bangin whip? (I don't give a fuck) You can live in the hood and shit But remember who you bangin with (cause I don't give a fuck) [Verse 3: Ca$his] Loadin the cup folk, loadin it up tote Hang fire up I, choke from the gun smoke That's on the boss mayn, my Nina Ross came Place gangbangers, into a coffin This is renegades, Rick not really paid Gave Ca$h pistols, now they milli sprayed Full bricks of raw, nigga that's really weight While my workers foldin, now that's really cake Give it right back to 'em, watch it regenerate I'm a degenerate black bandit, livin ape Niggas dig in they pockets like DJ's dig in crates If you cuttin my profits, you gon' in to dish some cake Heckler Koch and, glass and vodka I'm the independent kingpin, cocaine Koch Fo' thieve blow weed, plus sold O-Z Niggas never son me, I was born O.G. fo' [Hook: Ca$his] Pussy niggas always talkin that shit What you flaggin, who you bangin with? (I don't give a fuck) You can live in the hood and shit But remember who you bangin with (I don't give a fuck) Pussy niggas talkin all that shit What you flaggin in your bangin whip? (I don't give a fuck) You can live in the hood and shit But remember who you bangin with (cause I don't give a fuck) [Outro: Eminem] Ayo Alchemist! Let's play 'em some of that new Stat Quo shit, man!
When “A Chorus Line” opened on Broadway in 1975 — having step-ball-changed its way uptown from the New York Shakespeare Festival — it was the livingest thing in a dead zone. Over its 15-year run, its youthful vigor helped resuscitate the moribund theater district, and musical theater in general.
Now “A Chorus Line” is 43, well past the age at which the anonymous ensemble dancers it honors would have retired, their bodies or bank accounts unable to hack it anymore. Still, if the show’s 11 o’clock anthem is correct, they are looking back on what they did for love — all those years spent on the line — without regret.
![]()
No regrets here, either. I’m always excited to see “A Chorus Line.” (Well, maybe not the movie.) In any reasonably faithful production, like the one that opened on Wednesday night as part of City Center’s 75th anniversary gala, what’s thrilling about the show invariably remains so. But I wonder if the rest is beginning to get creaky.
And make no mistake, this “Chorus Line,” which runs through Sunday evening, is religiously faithful. Like the 2006 Broadway revival, which Ben Brantley called an “anatomically correct reproduction” in his Times review, this one is directed by Bob Avian and choreographed by Baayork Lee to simulate the original. (Mr. Avian choreographed that production with Michael Bennett; Ms. Lee played Connie in it.) The now classic designs (sets by Robin Wagner, costumes by Theoni V. Aldredge, lighting by Tharon Musser) appear to have been retrieved from storage; you can almost smell the naphthalene wafting from the ultra-’70s woolens.
![]()
The advantages of this fidelity go beyond historical interest. It’s an immense pleasure but also a profound education to see how Bennett and Mr. Avian — working with the composer Marvin Hamlisch, the lyricist Edward Kleban and the book writers James Kirkwood and Nicholas Dante — put the puzzle together.
Has one number ever so efficiently established, as “I Hope I Get It” does, what a show is about, setting up its theme (the desperate need to perform), suggesting its conflicts, introducing its many characters and establishing its style?
The perfectly organic sequence — you can’t tell where the collaborators’ individual contributions begin and end — demonstrates everything that’s best about “A Chorus Line.” It’s not the steps themselves; it’s the architecture. Assembling bodies into masses of light and dark, wiping the stage picture, irising in on an individual or panning the entire ensemble, Bennett creates a rhythm of revelation more akin to film than theater.
At the same time, his visual minimalism, his use of blackness to set off its opposite, allows for effects that are distinctly theatrical, as when the dancers periodically return to their original positions to recreate the line, or when the line becomes a gaptoothed smile after someone gets injured.
[What’s new onstage and off: Sign up for our Theater Update newsletter]
In these large-scale elements, “A Chorus Line” remains unimpeachable, even in a production that is necessarily a bit shaggy. (The City Center cast had only three weeks of rehearsal.) But just as the individual steps have always felt less important than the big picture, the individual stories of the dancers are beginning to feel less important than their group characteristics.
That’s an irony, of course, for a musical whose foundational purpose was to reward the contributions and sacrifices of ensemble dancers by making them the stars. Those dancers, after all, are auditioning for a show whose actual star we never meet. As Zach, the director-choreographer pulls them one by one from the line to learn more about them, we are meant to engage in the specifics of their stories. How did they start dancing? Who got in their way? Why did they keep going?
But these stories are sounding a little trite in 2018. Even when sharply performed — I especially enjoyed Jay Armstrong Johnson’s catty Bobby, Melanie Moore’s oddball Judy and Anthony Wayne’s overenthusiastic Richie — their tales of woe are both long-winded and unsurprising. The underlying commonalities among them (everyone’s sensitivity was mercilessly trampled in youth) are no less repetitive for being believable and touching.
Even when treated more lightly, as in “Sing!” and “Dance: Ten; Looks: Three,” the punch lines seem pro forma, as if Bennett and his collaborators were looking to fill out a program with the requisite number of comedy bits. Only the first such number — “I Can Do That,” performed with immense charm here by Tommy Bracco as Mike — seems to hold its own.
In compensation for the attention splitting that the original concept necessitated, “A Chorus Line” gradually reveals its focus on a central dancer, Cassie. Having made it off the line into featured roles, Cassie found her further rise blocked by a case of self-diagnosed bad acting. Now she wants to return to the ensemble, a fate that Zach — her former lover, it turns out — resists on her behalf as if it were death.
It’s here, in the story of the relationship between Zach (Tony Yazbeck) and Cassie (Robyn Hurder), that “A Chorus Line” most shows its age and its underlying confusions. It’s not just that the dialogue now sounds like soap opera psychobabble. But Zach’s argument — not helped by his spending most of the show as a disembodied voice booming orders over the so-called “god mic” — seems to undermine the idea that the rest of the show is promoting: That the true stars are the non-stars.
“A Chorus Line” has never really been able to solve the Zach problem, perhaps because he is so clearly based on Bennett himself. It helps that Mr. Yazbeck, even playing a brute, has tremendous stage warmth. But the only time this story really makes sense is when Cassie dances it — not so much in her big solo, “The Music and the Mirror,” as in her audition sequences. Her desperation to stop being exceptional so she can get the job (watch Ms. Hurder struggle to tone down her extensions) is heartbreaking.
Broadway World Chat Boards
That’s the “Chorus Line” compromise. It will never say in words what it demonstrates so eloquently in movement. Even in the best productions, and this one’s good enough, it will always be a Cassie.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |